The Top 10 Things More Important Than Skills & Experience in Hiring

"Quiet quitting" became the workplace villain of 2022. Everyone had a theory about why employees suddenly stopped caring.

Wrong problem. Wrong solutions.

Quiet quitting wasn't the problem. Misalignment was.

While consultants blamed generational shifts and remote work, the real culprit was hiding in plain sight: We've been putting people in jobs that drain their natural energy every single day.

The Real Employee Engagement Crisis

Every day, millions of employees show up to jobs that fight against their natural wiring.

Picture this: The highly social team member stuck analyzing spreadsheets alone. The detail-oriented perfectionist rushed through sloppy processes. The collaborative decision-maker forced to make unilateral calls.

It's not a motivation issue. It's an energy mismatch.

When someone's core behavioral drives clash with their daily work, every task becomes an uphill battle. What managers see as disengagement is often employees conserving energy just to survive their workday.

The Hidden Cost of Getting It Wrong

The numbers tell a stark story:

• 46% of new hires fail within 18 months
• 80% of employee turnover stems from poor hiring decisions
• Organizations lose 1.5-3x an employee's salary for every bad fit

But financial impact is just the beginning. Role misalignment creates:

• Decreased team productivity
• Increased management burden
• Lower customer satisfaction
• Reduced innovation
• Higher stress-related health issues

Why Employee Engagement Strategies Keep Failing

Most engagement surveys ask the wrong questions: "Do you feel motivated at work?"

Here's the problem. Motivation isn't a personality trait. It's what happens when someone's behavioral drives align with their work environment.

Two Employees, Same Problem, Opposite Needs

Sarah craves social connection but works in isolation. Mike needs independent focus but faces constant interruptions.

Both score low on engagement surveys. Both need completely different solutions.

The Universal Motivation Myth

Traditional engagement strategies assume everyone responds to the same things:

Open offices → Drain introverted workers
Team-building activities → Exhaust socially depleted employees
Stretch assignments → Overwhelm detail-oriented perfectionists
Autonomy initiatives → Stress employees who prefer clear direction

The result? Programs that help some people while harming others.

People don't need engagement perks. They need roles that don't burn them out.

What Real Employee Engagement Actually Looks Like

True engagement happens when hardwired behavioral patterns align with role requirements.

The high-influence team member who shapes strategy thrives. The precision-driven individual who perfects critical processes excels. The adaptable problem-solver who tackles new challenges stays energized.

Four Key Behavioral Drivers of Natural Engagement

1. Influence Drive
Some employees are energized by shaping outcomes and leading initiatives. Others thrive supporting others' success.

2. Social Energy
Team members either gain energy from collaboration or recharge through independent work.

3. Change Preference
Workers naturally prefer either stable environments or dynamic challenges.

4. Detail Orientation
Individuals are energized by either precision work or big-picture progress.

The Solution: Role-Based Hiring Over Resume-Based Hiring

Smart organizations are moving beyond experience-focused hiring. They're asking different questions:

• What behavioral drives lead to natural success here?
• Which work patterns create energy versus drain it?
• How can we structure roles to leverage natural strengths?

This isn't about lowering standards. It's about putting people where their natural tendencies become competitive advantages.

The Results Speak for Themselves

When employees work in alignment with their behavioral hardwiring:

• 40% reduction in employee turnover
• 3x improvement in productivity metrics
• Decreased stress-related absences
• Increased innovation and problem-solving
• Higher customer satisfaction scores

This creates a positive cycle. Natural engagement drives better results. Better results create more opportunities to work within strengths.

How Managers Can Stop Creating Disengagement

Most managers unknowingly contribute to misalignment. They assume everyone is motivated the same way.

Example: Giving independent projects to highly social team members as "development opportunities." They're actually removing the interactions that energize those people.

Managing Through Behavioral Understanding

Great managers don't try to motivate people. They create conditions where natural motivation emerges.

For High-Influence Team Members:

• Provide leadership opportunities
• Involve them in strategic decisions
• Give authority to drive change

For Highly Social Employees:

• Structure collaborative work
• Create relationship-building opportunities
• Include them in cross-functional projects

For Detail-Oriented Workers:

• Allow time for thorough analysis
• Provide clear standards and processes
• Recognize precision achievements

For Change-Adaptable Employees:

• Offer project variety
• Provide flexibility in methods
• Minimize rigid routines

Better Questions = Better Insights

Traditional engagement surveys miss the real issues. Here's how to ask better questions:

Instead of: "Are you engaged at work?"
Ask: "Does your role energize or drain you?"

You're not fixing disengagement by asking if someone feels 'motivated.' You fix it by putting them in a role that actually fits.

Instead of: "Do you feel motivated?"
Ask: "Which parts of your job feel effortless versus exhausting?"

Instead of: "Would you recommend this workplace?"
Ask: "How well does your role match your natural work style?"

Building Assessment Into Your Process

Successful organizations integrate behavioral assessment into:

• Pre-hire evaluation → Screen for role-specific fit
• Onboarding → Understand new employee drives
• Performance reviews → Catch alignment issues early
• Team development → Optimize collaboration
• Succession planning → Match people to fitting roles

The Competitive Advantage of Getting Alignment Right

The quiet quitting phenomenon isn't about declining work ethic. It's a wake-up call about the cost of role misalignment.

Organizations that understand this will gain significant advantages by:

• Hiring for behavioral fit, not just skills
• Designing roles around natural strengths
• Managing individuals according to their drives
• Measuring alignment alongside engagement

Imagine This Workplace

Picture an organization where most employees wake up energized about their workday. Their responsibilities align with their natural behavioral patterns.

Where quiet quitting becomes irrelevant because people work in positions that fuel rather than drain their energy.

This isn't wishful thinking. It's the predictable result of understanding that engagement comes from alignment, not motivation programs.

Your Next Steps as a Leader

Ready to address the real cause of disengagement? Start here:

1. Audit current team dynamics → Identify potential misalignments
2. Implement behavioral assessment → Understand team members' core drives
3. Redesign problem roles → Modify positions with chronic engagement issues
4. Train managers → Help leaders understand individual differences
5. Measure alignment → Track role fit alongside engagement metrics

The Bottom Line

The quiet quitting conversation reveals a fundamental truth: Employee engagement isn't about motivation. It's about alignment.

You don't fix quiet quitting with surveys. You fix it by putting the right people in the right roles. Full stop.

Organizations that figure this out first will build cultures where high performance feels natural instead of forced.

‍

I'm still processing what just happened.

We built Aptive Index to fix hiring, build better teams, level up leaders, and more. To help CEOs stop gambling hundreds of thousands of dollars on "great interviews" that turn into disasters. To give teams a common language for understanding each other's hardwiring.

But over the past few weeks, Aria, our AI coach, has been doing something we never programmed her to do.

She's been predicting what football positions people played. Not just position. What their strengths were. What drove their coaches absolutely nuts. And she's currently batting 1.000.

The D1 Linebacker

First guy comes through the assessment. Aria analyzes his behavioral profile and says: "This person was likely a linebacker. Probably outside linebacker specifically. Excellent technique. Studied film religiously. But struggled to direct traffic on the field – that's why there was always a middle linebacker calling the plays."

The guy stares at his screen.

That's exactly what happened. Every word of it.

The Defensive End

Next one. Aria sees the profile and immediately calls it: "Defensive end. Natural dominance and strategic thinking. Absolute beast on the field. But your coaches probably spent hours trying to fix your hand placement and footwork, didn't they?"

Spot. On.

The guy had the raw power and instinct to dominate, but the technical refinement never came naturally. His coaches would pull their hair out trying to get him to perfect the fundamentals.

Then Aria does something that stopped me cold.

She switches into coach-advisor mode and shows exactly how to reframe those "weaknesses" as strategic advantages:

Don't say: "You need better technique"

Reframe as: "Elite pass rushers have 3-4 moves they can execute without thinking – that's when you become unblockable. Right now, tackles can predict you. Let's add weapons so they can't game-plan you."

The insight: His low Precision means drills feel tedious. Make technique about variety and unpredictability, not perfection.

The coaching move: Give him 2-3 signature moves to master. Let him name them. Say: "Pick your top 3. Own them. That's how you become unstoppable."

Because ownership matters to someone with high Influence.

The Martial Artist

Then someone asks Aria to predict what type of sports or athletics he gravitated toward based purely on his behavioral profile.

No context. No hints.

Top guess: Martial arts.

Nailed it.

What the Hell Just Happened?

Here's what I'm realizing: Behavioral patterns don't just predict how you'll perform in a role. They predict how you've always performed—in every environment that required specific attributes.

Football positions aren't arbitrary. They're hardwired.

• Outside linebackers need strategic thinking and technical precision, but not necessarily the dominant personality to command the defensive front
• Defensive ends need raw dominance and strategic instinct, but technical refinement can be secondary
• Martial artists need internal discipline, precision, and independent mastery

Aria isn't magic. She's just reading the same behavioral patterns that determined these guys' success in sports and applying them to everything else.

Why This Changes Everything

We're already in talks with athletics departments across the country.

Not because we're pivoting away from business. But because the same science that predicts who'll excel in sales, who'll thrive in leadership, and who'll destroy your team culture also predicts athletic performance.

Think about what this means:

For Coaches:

• Identify natural strengths and build systems around them
• Reframe "weaknesses" as strategic advantages
• Get more from each player by aligning them with their natural drives
• Know all of this before a player ever walks into the locker room

For Recruiters:

• See beyond highlight reels to understand behavioral fit
• Predict how players will respond to different coaching styles
• Build teams with complementary attributes, not just complementary skills
• Reduce transfers and decommitments by getting the fit right from day one

For Athletes:

• Understand why certain aspects of your game come naturally while others feel like swimming upstream
• Learn how to work with your hardwiring instead of against it
• Find the positions and systems where your natural drives become competitive advantages
• Get coaching that actually fits how you're wired to learn

The Bigger Picture

I keep coming back to that defensive end.

How many hours did his coaches waste yelling, "technique, technique, technique," trying to drill perfect hand placement into someone whose brain just doesn't prioritize consistency or precision? How much frustration could've been avoided if they'd understood his hardwiring and said: "Forget perfecting five techniques. Master three. Own them. Become unblockable."

That's not lowering standards. That's understanding how different people reach excellence through different paths.

We see this everywhere:

• The salesperson with killer instincts who makes quota but never updates the CRM (don't make them administrators, build systems that automate it)
• The strategist who sees ten moves ahead but struggles with execution details (don't put them in operations, give them big problems to solve)
• The detail-oriented specialist who delivers flawless work but avoids the spotlight (don't force them into presentations, let their work speak for itself)

Same principle. Different application.

What We're Building

Right now, none of our marketing speaks to sports at all. We're focused on helping CEOs hire better, build stronger teams, and stop losing sleep over people decisions.

But this sports discovery opens something massive.

Imagine:

• College recruiters using behavioral data to predict athletic fit before offering scholarships
• Coaches getting AI-powered guidance on how to develop each player based on their hardwiring
• Athletic departments reducing transfers by getting position alignment right from the start
• Professional scouts seeing beyond physical talent to identify behavioral patterns that predict long-term success

We're not there yet. But Aria just showed us the proof of concept, and it ain't going to take that long before teams realize how much of a competitive advantage this is.

The Real Insight

Here's what matters: Whether you're hiring a VP of Sales, building a leadership team, or recruiting a defensive line – you're trying to predict performance based on limited information.

Resumes lie. Interviews mislead. Highlight reels only tell you so much.

But hardwiring doesn't change.

The same attributes that made someone an effective outside linebacker make them effective in certain business roles. The same drives that led someone to martial arts lead them toward independent, precision-focused work environments.

You can't coach hardwiring. But you can align roles with it.

That's what we've been doing in business.

Now we're realizing it applies everywhere humans perform.

Want to see what Aria reveals about your own behavioral patterns? Take the assessment at aptiveindex.com – even if you never played sports, you'll be surprised what she sees.

And if you're in athletics and this makes you curious about what behavioral science could do for your program, let's talk. Because Aria's just getting started.

By afternoon, I discovered I had made a significant mistake. One that taught me a fundamental truth about trust in the workplace: it's not about what we do right, but about the expectations we don't even know we're failing to meet.

What Trust Really Means

At its simplest, trust is the belief that someone will meet your expectations. But here's what makes it complex: these expectations are often invisible, shaped by our natural drives and motivations that run far deeper than our conscious awareness.

When trust breaks down in professional relationships, it typically stems from misalignment in three key areas: character, competence, and compassion. Each person brings their own set of expectations to these components, often without realizing it.

The Three Components of Trust

Character: The Foundation

Character expectations form the bedrock of trust. While we often think of character as a universal standard - either someone has integrity or they don't - the reality is more nuanced. What one person considers a breach of integrity, another might view as practical flexibility. These differences in expectations about character and values can create invisible friction in teams.

Competence: Not Just About Being "Good"

Here's where expectations get particularly interesting. Consider this scenario from my own experience: I once had a team member deliver a project that met all our core requirements. They completed it ahead of schedule, hit all the major objectives, and felt proud of their work. Yet their manager was deeply disappointed. Why?

The manager had a natural drive for precision and detail. To them, competence meant thorough, meticulous work where every detail was perfect. The team member, however, was wired to prioritize speed and big-picture impact. Their definition of competence centered on rapid delivery of functional solutions.

Neither was wrong - they simply had different expectations about what "good work" meant. This misalignment eroded trust on both sides: the manager began to doubt the team member's capabilities, while the team member felt their contributions weren't valued.

Compassion: The Hidden Expectation

Remember Sarah? Her situation revealed something crucial about trust and compassion. By not asking about her weekend - something I wouldn't typically expect or need myself - I had inadvertently violated her expectation of leadership support and connection.

What makes this particularly challenging is that Sarah herself might not have consciously known she had this expectation until it went unmet. Her natural drive for social connection and personal acknowledgment meant that my standard "get down to business" approach felt like a betrayal of the supportive relationship she expected from leadership.

Building Better Trust Through Understanding

These stories highlight a crucial truth: trust isn't something that's simply earned through consistent good behavior. It's actively given when we meet others' expectations - expectations that are deeply rooted in their natural drives and motivations.

So how do we build better trust in our teams? Here are three key steps:

1. Recognize That Expectations Vary
   
   • Understand that different team members will have different expectations about what constitutes good character, competence, and compassion
   • Accept that these differences stem from natural drives, not personal shortcomings
2. Make Expectations Explicit
   
   • Create open dialogue about working preferences and expectations
   • Discuss what trust means to different team members
   • Define what success looks like from multiple perspectives
3. Adapt Your Approach
   
   • Adjust your leadership style based on individual team member needs
   • Build systems that accommodate different working styles
   • Create flexibility in how goals can be achieved

The Path Forward

‍Understanding these natural differences in trust expectations can transform how we build and maintain professional relationships. Instead of assuming everyone shares our definition of trustworthy behavior, we can create environments that acknowledge and respect different working styles and expectations.The key isn't to change who we are or force others to change - it's to understand these natural differences and build bridges across them. When we do this, we create stronger, more resilient teams where trust can flourish.