Cancelling DEI? Then Out With the NFL Draft
Do you believe that those who are struggling should be given intentional advantages to help them succeed?
What if those advantages are deliberately more favorable than what's offered to those already at the top? What if we created entire systems designed to give extra support, resources, and opportunities to those who are behind?
If you felt a visceral "no" just now, I get it. Such suggestions often trigger immediate pushback about merit, fairness, and earning your way.
But what if I told you that some of America's most beloved and profitable institutions have been doing exactly this for decades? And not only do we accept it - we enthusiastically tune in every week to watch it work?
Welcome to the NFL draft.
Every year, we watch a system that deliberately advantages struggling teams. The Browns don't get told to "pull themselves up by their bootstraps." The Giants aren’t accused of cheating when they get early picks of top talent. Instead, we've built entire structures to ensure that those at the bottom get extra help, additional resources, and preferential access to new opportunities.
And here's the kicker: Look at the Kansas City Chiefs heading into Super Bowl 2025 this Sunday. Despite a system that deliberately gives advantages to struggling teams, the Chiefs are appearing in their fourth Super Bowl in five years. Having systematically lower draft picks hasn't destroyed their ability to excel. They've simply had to continue working hard and making the most of their opportunities - just like everyone else.
Giving advantages to those who are behind doesn't automatically diminish those at the top. The Chiefs aren't losing because other teams get better draft picks. Excellence, merit, and hard work still matter – we've just created a system that gives everyone a better shot at achieving them.
Why? Because we understand something fundamental about sports that we seem to struggle with in other contexts: Sometimes, helping those who are behind lifts up the entire game.
Now, let's be clear - the challenges faced by struggling NFL teams aren't directly comparable to the systemic barriers and historical disadvantages faced by marginalized communities in our society. Professional sports franchises worth billions aren't the same as generations of families who've been denied access to education, housing, or career advancement opportunities. The parallel isn't perfect.
But the principle illuminates something important about how we think about advantage and opportunity. If we can understand that giving struggling teams extra support makes the whole league stronger, why do we resist programs designed to give historically disadvantaged groups better access to opportunity? If we celebrate systematic advantage every Sunday, why do we question it on Monday morning?
I don't claim to have the perfect policy solutions for addressing generations of systemic inequality. These are complex challenges that require thoughtful, nuanced approaches. But what I do know is this: There are people and communities who need us, as a society, to create better pathways to opportunity - not handouts, but real chances to compete and excel. Just as we've done in sports, we can create systems that both maintain high standards and ensure everyone has a fair shot at meeting them.
The timing couldn't be more relevant. As we debate dismantling DEI programs in 2025, millions will gather this Sunday to watch our most profitable sports league showcase a system built on the principle that those with the longest distance to cover need extra support to compete. So perhaps before we rush to declare victory over "unfair" corporate DEI initiatives, we should ask ourselves: If we can cheer for equity on the field, why not in the workplace?
You may also like
"Quiet quitting" became the workplace villain of 2022. Everyone had a theory about why employees suddenly stopped caring.
Wrong problem. Wrong solutions.
Quiet quitting wasn't the problem. Misalignment was.
While consultants blamed generational shifts and remote work, the real culprit was hiding in plain sight: We've been putting people in jobs that drain their natural energy every single day.
The Real Employee Engagement Crisis
Every day, millions of employees show up to jobs that fight against their natural wiring.
Picture this: The highly social team member stuck analyzing spreadsheets alone. The detail-oriented perfectionist rushed through sloppy processes. The collaborative decision-maker forced to make unilateral calls.
It's not a motivation issue. It's an energy mismatch.
When someone's core behavioral drives clash with their daily work, every task becomes an uphill battle. What managers see as disengagement is often employees conserving energy just to survive their workday.
The Hidden Cost of Getting It Wrong
The numbers tell a stark story:
- 46% of new hires fail within 18 months
- 80% of employee turnover stems from poor hiring decisions
- Organizations lose 1.5-3x an employee's salary for every bad fit
But financial impact is just the beginning. Role misalignment creates:
- Decreased team productivity
- Increased management burden
- Lower customer satisfaction
- Reduced innovation
- Higher stress-related health issues
Why Employee Engagement Strategies Keep Failing
Most engagement surveys ask the wrong questions: "Do you feel motivated at work?"
Here's the problem. Motivation isn't a personality trait. It's what happens when someone's behavioral drives align with their work environment.
Two Employees, Same Problem, Opposite Needs
Sarah craves social connection but works in isolation. Mike needs independent focus but faces constant interruptions.
Both score low on engagement surveys. Both need completely different solutions.
The Universal Motivation Myth
Traditional engagement strategies assume everyone responds to the same things:
Open offices → Drain introverted workers
Team-building activities → Exhaust socially depleted employees
Stretch assignments → Overwhelm detail-oriented perfectionists
Autonomy initiatives → Stress employees who prefer clear direction
The result? Programs that help some people while harming others.
People don't need engagement perks. They need roles that don't burn them out.
What Real Employee Engagement Actually Looks Like
True engagement happens when hardwired behavioral patterns align with role requirements.
The high-influence team member who shapes strategy thrives. The precision-driven individual who perfects critical processes excels. The adaptable problem-solver who tackles new challenges stays energized.
Four Key Behavioral Drivers of Natural Engagement
1. Influence Drive
Some employees are energized by shaping outcomes and leading initiatives. Others thrive supporting others' success.
2. Social Energy
Team members either gain energy from collaboration or recharge through independent work.
3. Change Preference
Workers naturally prefer either stable environments or dynamic challenges.
4. Detail Orientation
Individuals are energized by either precision work or big-picture progress.
The Solution: Role-Based Hiring Over Resume-Based Hiring
Smart organizations are moving beyond experience-focused hiring. They're asking different questions:
- What behavioral drives lead to natural success here?
- Which work patterns create energy versus drain it?
- How can we structure roles to leverage natural strengths?
This isn't about lowering standards. It's about putting people where their natural tendencies become competitive advantages.
The Results Speak for Themselves
When employees work in alignment with their behavioral hardwiring:
- 40% reduction in employee turnover
- 3x improvement in productivity metrics
- Decreased stress-related absences
- Increased innovation and problem-solving
- Higher customer satisfaction scores
This creates a positive cycle. Natural engagement drives better results. Better results create more opportunities to work within strengths.
How Managers Can Stop Creating Disengagement
Most managers unknowingly contribute to misalignment. They assume everyone is motivated the same way.
Example: Giving independent projects to highly social team members as "development opportunities." They're actually removing the interactions that energize those people.
Managing Through Behavioral Understanding
Great managers don't try to motivate people. They create conditions where natural motivation emerges.
For High-Influence Team Members:
- Provide leadership opportunities
- Involve them in strategic decisions
- Give authority to drive change
For Highly Social Employees:
- Structure collaborative work
- Create relationship-building opportunities
- Include them in cross-functional projects
For Detail-Oriented Workers:
- Allow time for thorough analysis
- Provide clear standards and processes
- Recognize precision achievements
For Change-Adaptable Employees:
- Offer project variety
- Provide flexibility in methods
- Minimize rigid routines
Better Questions = Better Insights
Traditional engagement surveys miss the real issues. Here's how to ask better questions:
Instead of: "Are you engaged at work?"
Ask: "Does your role energize or drain you?"
You're not fixing disengagement by asking if someone feels 'motivated.' You fix it by putting them in a role that actually fits.
Instead of: "Do you feel motivated?"
Ask: "Which parts of your job feel effortless versus exhausting?"
Instead of: "Would you recommend this workplace?"
Ask: "How well does your role match your natural work style?"
Building Assessment Into Your Process
Successful organizations integrate behavioral assessment into:
- Pre-hire evaluation → Screen for role-specific fit
- Onboarding → Understand new employee drives
- Performance reviews → Catch alignment issues early
- Team development → Optimize collaboration
- Succession planning → Match people to fitting roles
The Competitive Advantage of Getting Alignment Right
The quiet quitting phenomenon isn't about declining work ethic. It's a wake-up call about the cost of role misalignment.
Organizations that understand this will gain significant advantages by:
- Hiring for behavioral fit, not just skills
- Designing roles around natural strengths
- Managing individuals according to their drives
- Measuring alignment alongside engagement
Imagine This Workplace
Picture an organization where most employees wake up energized about their workday. Their responsibilities align with their natural behavioral patterns.
Where quiet quitting becomes irrelevant because people work in positions that fuel rather than drain their energy.
This isn't wishful thinking. It's the predictable result of understanding that engagement comes from alignment, not motivation programs.
Your Next Steps as a Leader
Ready to address the real cause of disengagement? Start here:
- Audit current team dynamics → Identify potential misalignments
- Implement behavioral assessment → Understand team members' core drives
- Redesign problem roles → Modify positions with chronic engagement issues
- Train managers → Help leaders understand individual differences
- Measure alignment → Track role fit alongside engagement metrics
The Bottom Line
The quiet quitting conversation reveals a fundamental truth: Employee engagement isn't about motivation. It's about alignment.
You don't fix quiet quitting with surveys. You fix it by putting the right people in the right roles. Full stop.
Organizations that figure this out first will build cultures where high performance feels natural instead of forced.
The Resume Relic
Let's face it: resumes are relics. They're snapshots of past experiences and skills, often carefully curated and increasingly unreliable in the age of AI-generated content. Even if we could guarantee their authenticity, two critical questions emerge:
- Can resumes reliably tell us about a candidate's skills and experience in today's rapidly evolving job market?
- Are skills and experience even among the top things we should be looking for in a candidate?
The truth is, the resume-centric approach to hiring was never foolproof. It became the standard because, for a long time, it was the best option we had. But in today's dynamic business landscape, it's time to look beyond the paper and focus on factors that truly predict success.
The Top 10 Factors More Important Than Skills & Experience
Here are ten factors that might be more predictive of a candidate's success than their listed skills and experience:
1. Hardwiring and Innate Drivers
Understanding a person's core motivations and natural tendencies can provide invaluable insights into how they'll perform in a role and within a team. Tools like Aptive Index can help uncover these crucial attributes. These innate characteristics often determine how effectively someone will apply their skills and experience.
2. Adaptability and Learning Agility
In a rapidly changing business environment, the ability to adapt quickly and learn new skills is often more valuable than existing knowledge. A candidate who can pivot quickly and absorb new information will outperform one with a static skill set.
3. Culture Fit and Values Alignment
How well does a candidate's personal values and work style align with your organization's culture and mission? This alignment can significantly impact their job satisfaction, productivity, and longevity with your company.
4. Emotional Intelligence (EQ)
Self-awareness, self-regulation, motivation, empathy, and social skills are crucial for effective collaboration and leadership. High EQ often translates to better team dynamics and customer relationships.
5. Problem-Solving Approach
How a candidate approaches complex problems can reveal more about their potential than their current skill set. Look for creative thinking, analytical skills, and the ability to break down complex issues.6. Resilience and GritThe capacity to persist in the face of challenges and bounce back from setbacks is a strong indicator of long-term success. This trait often separates high performers from the rest.
7. Potential for Growth
Assessing a candidate's capacity and desire for development can be more valuable than their current skills. Look for curiosity, eagerness to learn, and a history of personal and professional growth.
8. Collaboration and Teamwork Skills
The ability to work effectively with others and contribute to a positive team dynamic is crucial in most modern workplaces. These skills often determine how well a person can apply their individual abilities within a team context.
9. Alignment with Future Organizational Needs
Consider how well a candidate's potential aligns with where your organization is heading, not just where it is now. This forward-thinking approach can help future-proof your workforce.
10. Diversity of Thought and Experience
A candidate's unique perspectives can bring valuable diversity to problem-solving and innovation within the organization. This diversity often leads to more creative solutions and better decision-making.
Moving Beyond the Resume
Does this mean we should toss resumes out the window? Not necessarily. They can still provide useful context about a candidate's journey. However, they shouldn't be the primary factor in hiring decisions.Instead, we need to develop more holistic assessment methods that take into account the factors listed above. This might involve:
- Structured interviews that probe for adaptability, problem-solving skills, and cultural fit
- Psychometric assessments to understand a candidate's innate drivers and potential
- Job auditions or simulations to see how candidates perform in real-world scenarios
- Reference checks that focus on a candidate's soft skills and ability to learn and grow
Conclusion
It's time to move beyond the resume and rethink what truly matters in hiring. By focusing on factors like innate drivers, adaptability, and cultural fit, we can make better hiring decisions. This approach not only leads to more successful hires but also opens doors for candidates who might have been overlooked in a traditional resume-centric process.The future of hiring isn't about finding the person with the perfect list of skills and experiences. It's about finding individuals with the right potential, drive, and alignment with your organization's values and goals. By prioritizing these ten factors over traditional skills and experience, you'll be well on your way to building a more dynamic, adaptable, and successful workforce.
Most leaders spend years building an image of unwavering confidence, believing that showing any weakness will undermine their authority. But research reveals a different reality: the armor of invulnerability that many leaders wear doesn't protect their effectiveness. It limits their impact.
What if everything you've been taught about projecting strength is actually making you weaker as a leader?
The Armor We Wear
Most leaders craft personas of unwavering confidence, always having the right answers, never showing doubt. We wear our invulnerability like armor, believing it protects our authority and earns respect from our teams.
But organizational psychology research consistently confirms: that armor isn't protecting you. It's suffocating the very qualities that make leaders truly powerful. Vulnerable leaders build deeper trust, foster more innovation, and create higher-performing teams than their seemingly perfect counterparts.
The Science Behind Strategic Vulnerability
Research demonstrates that leaders who practice strategic vulnerability see measurable improvements:
76% increase in team trust when leaders acknowledge their limitations
27% higher employee engagement with authentically vulnerable leadership
40% better problem-solving outcomes when leaders admit uncertainty
67% higher psychological safety scores in teams led by vulnerable leaders
These translate directly to business performance through improved employee retention, faster innovation, and more effective decision-making.
Choosing Vulnerability
Every leader faces moments when their old approach stops working. When the armor becomes too heavy. When maintaining perfect facades becomes exhausting and counterproductive.
These are transformation opportunities. Chances to move from image management to authentic leadership that drives real results. The choice to embrace strategic vulnerability requires tremendous strength and confidence, but it's what separates truly effective leaders from those who simply manage through authority.
Three Levels of Vulnerable Leadership
Level 1: Intellectual Vulnerability
Admitting what you don't know instead of pretending to have all the answers. A CEO transforms meetings by starting with "Here's what I'm struggling with this week," creating cultures where problems surface early.
Level 2: Emotional Vulnerability
Sharing appropriate concerns and pressures you're facing. During uncertain times, saying "I'm honestly concerned about how this will work out, but I'm committed to figuring it out together" creates shared determination that false confidence never achieves.
Level 3: Capability Vulnerability
Acknowledging your limitations and seeking help to fill gaps. When leaders admit they're not skilled in certain areas and bring in expertise, they become more effective by leveraging everyone's strengths.
The Vulnerability-Trust Connection
Trust isn't built through perfection. It's built through authenticity. When leaders are vulnerable, they signal that it's safe for others to be human too. This creates psychological safety, the foundation of high-performing teams.
Think about the leaders who have had the biggest impact on your career. They likely weren't the ones who seemed perfect. They were the ones who showed their humanity while maintaining their competence and commitment to others' success.
Practical Applications for Leaders
Start with Intellectual Vulnerability: Admit when you don't know something in low-stakes situations. Ask questions that reveal genuine curiosity about others' perspectives.
Create Feedback Culture: Regularly ask "What should I stop, start, or continue doing as your leader?" Actually listen and act on what you hear.
Model Recovery: When things go wrong, demonstrate how to take responsibility and learn constructively. Frame failures as learning opportunities for the entire team.
Share Learning Moments: When you discover new insights, share them as useful information that models continuous learning at every level.
The Business Impact
Organizations with vulnerable leaders see:
Enhanced Innovation: Teams feel safe to take risks and propose unconventional solutions when leaders model intellectual humility.
Improved Retention: People stay with leaders who see them as whole humans, not just resources to manage.
Faster Problem Resolution: Issues surface earlier when people aren't afraid to bring challenging news to defensive leaders.
Better Decision Making: Leaders access more information and diverse perspectives when team members feel safe to share honest input.
Stronger Culture: Authenticity at the top creates more genuine, productive workplace relationships throughout the organization.
Common Leadership Misconceptions
Strategic vulnerability requires tremendous strength, not weakness. Authentic leadership increases rather than decreases respect and trust. Modern organizations require psychological safety that only vulnerable leaders can create. The real risk is maintaining facades that prevent genuine connection and honest communication.
The Leadership Evolution
The most impactful leaders aren't those who never face challenges. They're the ones who show others it's safe to encounter difficulties, learn from them, and keep moving forward together.
Your team doesn't need you to be invincible. They need you to be real, committed, and brave enough to model the behavior you want to see throughout your organization.
When leaders embrace strategic vulnerability, they create permission for everyone to bring their full capabilities to work. That's when organizations truly thrive.
Modern leadership requires the strength to show your humanity. Are you ready to discover what authentic leadership can accomplish?